1. Home
  2. Skeleton
  3. Diagnosis
  4. Indications
  5. Treatment

Authors of section

Authors

Theerachai Apivatthakakul, Jong-Keon Oh

Executive Editor

Michael Baumgaertner

Open all credits

Nailing (short nail)

1. General considerations

Introduction

A pertrochanteric fracture without a distal extension or without another fracture distally can be treated successfully with a short intramedullary nail.

A longer nail is required for fractures with subtrochanteric extension or associated femoral shaft fracture, and some surgeons prefer them routinely. Some manufacturers provide intermediate-length nails.

The trochanteric femoral nail advanced (TFNA) device is an intramedullary nail that uses a spiral blade or lag screw to obtain fixation in the femoral head.

The operative technique for other cephalomedullary devices is generally similar, but it is important to review the manufacturer’s guides for details.

Some systems offer the option to insert cement through the implant for augmentation in case of poor bone quality.

Another option is fracture compression/reduction along the helical blade/lag screw. This may be helpful if fracture gaps need to be closed after implant insertion.

Note: The fracture must be anatomically realigned before implant insertion. Inadequate reduction is a primary cause of treatment failure.
Trochanteric fracture fixed with a short intramedullary nail, with a spiral blade or lag screw
Note on illustrations

Throughout this treatment option illustrations of generic fracture patterns are shown, as four different types:

A) Unreduced fracture
B) Reduced fracture
C) Fracture reduced and fixed provisionally
D) Fracture fixed definitively

Generic fracture patterns

Closed vs open reduction

Fracture reduction should start with a closed attempt.

If manipulation does not lead to a satisfactory reduction, a percutaneous reduction technique should be performed.

The definitive decision for the treatment will be made after positioning the patient and an initial closed reduction. Since emergency department x-rays are often of suboptimal quality, verifying the preoperative diagnosis using image intensification is necessary.

Spiral blade vs lag screw

There is not yet a clear indication of when to use a spiral blade and when to select a lag screw in the elderly patient. It is, therefore, often surgeon’s preference.

In a young patient with hard bone, a blade is relatively contraindicated, and a screw should be used instead (with tapping).

Correct position of lag screw or blade

The thread of the lag screw (or tip of the spiral blade) needs to end in the trabecular bone structures to gain enough purchase. Therefore, it is important that the lag screw comes to lie in the center of the head-neck axis or slightly inferior to it. This allows for increased depth of the screw.

Incorrect nail and blade positioning for nail fixation of trochanteric fractures

Distal locking

Short nails should be routinely interlocked distally to ensure stability. Static or dynamic distal locking is at surgeon’s preference.

Preoperative planning

Anterior bow of the femur

Check the degree of the anterior bow of the femur on an x-ray of the uninjured extremity.

If there is excessive anterior bowing, the risk for anterior impingement is high and should be considered when choosing the entrance site.

Anterior bowing of the femur may increase the risk of impingement of the nail tip with the cortex during nail insertion

AO teaching video

Femur, proximal – Fractures – Intramedullary fixation using the TFN-Advanced (TFNA) proximal femoral nailing system

(28 minutes)

2. Patient positioning

Position the patient supine on the fracture table with the uninjured leg placed on a leg holder.

Unlike positioning to employ a DHS, it is important to ensure that the ipsilateral hip is adducted to allow nail entrance. To facilitate this, push the torso 10°–15° to the contralateral side.

For C-arm positioning to acquire optimal AP, lateral, and axial views, read the additional material on:

Patient placed supine on a fracture table with the ipsilateral hip adducted to allow nail entrance in the femoral shaft
Pitfall: Excessive traction, in an attempt to reduce the fracture, can lead to pelvic rotation around the perineal post of the fracture table. When the pelvis rotates, as illustrated, it produces relative abduction of the hip, thus interfering with access to the proximal femoral nail entry site.
Excessive traction, in an attempt to reduce the trochanteric fracture, can lead to pelvic rotation around the perineal post of the fracture table.
Scissors positioning

Placing both legs in traction prevents pelvic rotation that leads to abduction.

Flex the injured hip slightly and adduct it to allow nail entrance. Extend the hip on the uninjured side and abduct it to allow lateral imaging.

C-arm position to take AP and lateral views of the proximal femur with the patient supine on a traction table and the legs in scissors position

3. Reduction

Closed reduction

Closed reduction is usually achieved by:

  1. Pulling in the direction of the long axis of the leg to distract the fragments and regain length
  2. Adjustment of internal rotation of the femoral shaft ...
Closed reduction of a pertrochanteric fracture with pulling and internal rotation on a fracture table

... until the patella is facing forward on an AP view of the knee joint

AP view of the patella

Check the reduction in both the AP and lateral view with an image intensifier.

C-arm position for an AP view of the proximal femur with the patient supine on a fracture table

Assessment of reduction quality

Read the fracture line on the image intensifier views. Identify gaps or increased density due to overlapping of fragments.

Follow the medial cortical line on AP view and the anterior cortical line on the axial view. Identify any translational or angular malalignment.

Acceptable reduction quality shows the following patterns:

  • No gap or increased density visible along the fracture line

In the AP view:

  • Continuous medial cortical line
  • No varus angulation

In the lateral view:

  • Anteversion approximately 15°
  • Continuous anterior cortical line

For more details, see the additional material on assessment of reduction quality.

Patterns in AP and lateral view for acceptable reduction of trochanteric fractures

Percutaneous reduction

If closed reduction is not satisfactory, carry out a percutaneous reduction technique.

Open reduction

If percutaneous reduction fails, carry out a limited open reduction through a lateral approach.

Enlarge the lateral incision as necessary, splitting the fascia lata along its length and retracting the vastus lateralis anteriorly and medially. Direct visualization of the anterior fracture is mandatory.

Lateral approach to the proximal femur with a limited longitudinal incision

4. Implant selection

Shaft-neck angle

If possible, determine the most appropriate neck-shaft angle (angle subtended between the femoral-neck and shaft axes) using an AP view of the uninjured hip.

In most cases, an implant with a neck-shaft angle of 130° will be appropriate.

Confirm this angle intraoperatively after reduction.

If not possible preoperatively, determine the angle intraoperatively after reduction. Place the radiographic ruler and K-wire over the proximal femur and take an AP view.

Determination of the neck-shaft angle for selection of the correct intramedullary nail for fixation of a trochanteric fracture

Determination of nail diameter

Determine the intramedullary diameter by placing the radiographic ruler over the injured femur at the level of the nail tip and reading the diameter where the indicator fills the canal.

The distance between ruler and bone influences the correct estimation of diameter and needs to be considered.

Determining the intramedullary diameter of the femur at the level of the nail tip

5. Approach to the entry point

To approach the entry point, incise the skin in line with the femoral shaft axis and about 5 cm proximal to the tip of the trochanter.

Incision and nail entry point for intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

6. Nail insertion

Determining the entry point

The entry point is on the tip of the greater trochanter or slightly medial to it. This deviates about 5° from the axis of the medullary canal, consistent with the nail geometry. Take great care to avoid a lateral entry or reamer migration into the soft bone lateral to the tip, both of which force varus malalignment when the nail is ultimately inserted.

Determining the entry point for intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

Guide-wire insertion

Insert the guide wire through the tip of the greater trochanter and in line with the middle of the femoral neck, and slightly lateral to a line corresponding to the anatomical axis of the shaft.

Advance the guide wire in the femur shaft.

Guide-wire insertion for intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

Checking guide-wire position

Check the position of the guide wire using the image intensifier.

Ideally, the guide wire’s position in the femoral shaft should be central and deviate slightly proximally according to the degree of the lateral bend of the implant in the AP plane. In the axial view, it must be in line with the middle of the femoral neck.

Guide-wire insertion for intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

Opening of the femur

Insert the protection sleeve with its trocar over the guide wire and push it through the soft tissues until it abuts against the greater trochanter. Withdraw the trocar and insert an appropriate drill bit or reamer over the guide wire.

Opening the trochanter with a reamer for intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

Reaming of the medullary canal

Note: Only in exceptional cases, where the medullary canal is smaller than the chosen nail, will it be necessary to overream the femoral shaft so that its diameter is 1 mm greater than that of the chosen nail.
Reaming the medullary canal for intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

Insertion of the nail

Mount the nail on the insertion handle.

In most patients, the nail can be inserted manually.

Insert the nail over the guide wire.

Once the nail engages with the medullary canal, remove the guide wire and advance the nail fully.

Note: If resistance is encountered to full advancement, examine the lateral image to rule out anterior impingement of the tip of the nail. Reassess the entrance site. Consider further reaming. Avoid the temptation to deliver forceful mallet blows.
Nail insertion during intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

Insert the nail to such a depth that it will allow the blade or lag screw to be placed in the center of the femoral head.

With the aiming arm on the insertion handle, check correct insertion depth of the nail on AP view with a wire placed on the skin parallel to the guide-wire track.

Note: If the tip of the wire comes to lie superior to the center of the head, first reassess the fracture reduction to exclude varus malreduction. If this is checked, advancing the nail may help to achieve better blade/lag screw insertion.
Confirming correct nail insertion depth for intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

Check the axial view for alignment of the aiming arm with the head-neck axis. Adjust the rotation of the nail if necessary. A wire placed through the insertion handle parallel to the planned blade axis helps with identifying malrotation.

Pitfall: If external rotational adjustment > 5° is necessary, the guide-wire track in the AP view tends to move superiorly. Consider advancing the nail to correct this.
Confirming correct nail insertion depth for intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

7. Guide-wire insertion

Positioning of the guide wire

Insert the drill-sleeve assembly through the aiming arm and advance it through the soft tissues to the lateral cortex.

Guide-wire insertion during intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

Advance the guide-wire tip deeply across the dense trabecular bone of the head and into the subchondral bone of the femoral head, stopping 5 mm before the joint.

The ideal position of the guide wire in the AP plane is in line with the axis of the neck. In the lateral and axial views, it should be in line with the axis of the neck.

This ensures that the subsequent blade or lag-screw thread fully engages the very strong primary compressive trabecular bone.

Guide-wire insertion during intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

A wire position slightly inferior to the center of the femoral head is also acceptable. Further peripheral malposition prevents deep lag screw or blade placement and introduces rotational instability when axial load is applied.

Guide-wire insertion during intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

Measuring length of the blade/screw

Measure the insertion depth of the guide wire. Choose a blade/screw length as indicated.

The goal is to place the tip of the blade/screw centrally and within 5–7 mm from the joint.

Measuring blade/screw length for intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

8. Blade insertion

Drilling hole for the blade

Open the lateral cortex with the 11.0 mm drill bit.

Drilling for blade insertion during intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

Insertion of blade

Connect the blade to the inserter.

Insert the blade over the guide wire to the stop.

Blade insertion during intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

Locking of rotation

Tighten the locking mechanism in the upper part of the nail to lock the blade rotation.

By turning the screw half a turn counterclockwise, sliding of the blade in the nail will be allowed again.

Remove the guide wire.

Remove the inserter handle and drill sleeve.

Locking of blade rotation during intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

Option: augmentation

In severe osteoporotic bone, if not enough resistance is felt during blade insertion, consider cement augmentation before removing the inserter and drill sleeve.

Follow the instructions of the manufacturer’s technical guide.

Augmentation in intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture of a severe osteoporotic bone

9. Lag-screw insertion

Insertion of an antirotation wire

To avoid inadvertent rotational displacement during lag-screw insertion, add an extra K-wire through the designated hole in the aiming arm.

Insertion of an antirotation wire during intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

Drilling hole for lag screw

Open the lateral cortex with the 11.0 mm drill bit.

Predrill the screw track up to 10 mm short of the tip of the guide wire with the stepped reamer. Otherwise, the guide wire may fall out when the drill bit is removed.

Drilling for lag screw insertion during intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

Insertion of lag screw

In young, dense bone, tap the screw track to the desired screw depth.

Connect the screw to the inserter.

Insert the lag screw over the guide manually until the marking on the screw inserter reaches the guide sleeve.

In this implant, the inserter handle should be in line with the aiming arm to allow proper locking. Other systems may have different locking alignments.

Lag screw insertion during intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

Locking of rotation

Tighten the locking mechanism in the upper part of the nail to lock the lag-screw rotation.

By turning the screw half a turn counterclockwise, sliding of the lag screw in the nail will be allowed again.

Remove the inserter handle and drill sleeve.

Remove the wire(s).

Locking of blade rotation during intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

Option: Interfragmentary compression

If, after rotational locking of the lag screw, a fracture gap needs to be closed, interfragmentary compression may be performed by turning the compression nut clockwise before removal of the inserter handle and drill sleeve.

Take care not to overcompress. This may lead to pull-out of the lag screw, especially in osteoporotic bone.

Interfragmentary compression with intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

10. Distal locking

Static vs dynamic distal locking

For simple and multifragmentary pertrochanteric fractures, static locking is sufficient. This should be inserted according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Drilling hole for distal locking

Make a stab incision and insert the drill sleeve and trocar through the selected locking hole in the aiming device. Make sure the sleeve rests on the bone to avoid drill migration.

Drill both cortices.

Drilling for distal locking screw during intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

Insertion of locking screw

Insert a cortical screw of appropriate length bicortically.

Distal locking screw insertion during intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

11. Insertion of end cap

Insert an end cap if indicated.

As nearly none of the implants will be removed, this step is generally unnecessary and is up to surgeon’s preference.

Insertion of end cap during intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture

12. Final assessment

Check the reduction and final position of the nail in AP and lateral views.

Trochanteric fracture fixed with a short intramedullary nail, with a spiral blade or lag screw

13. Aftercare

Postoperative mobilization

The elderly patient may start with weight bearing as tolerated with walking aids the day after surgery.

Initial restricted weight bearing is required for the young patient. This can be reassessed at 6 weeks.

Unrestricted range-of-motion exercises of the hip joint are allowed.

Weight bearing as tolerated with walking aids after treatment of proximal femoral fractures

Pain control

To facilitate rehabilitation and prevent delirium, it is important to control the postoperative pain properly, eg, with a specific nerve block.

VTE prophylaxis

Patients with lower extremity fractures requiring treatment require deep vein prophylaxis.

The type and duration depend on VTE risk stratification.

Follow-up

Follow-up assessment for wound healing, neurologic status, function, and patient education should occur within 10–14 days.

At 3–6 weeks, check the position of the fracture with appropriate x-rays.

Recheck 6 weeks later for progressive fracture union.

Longer follow-up, at 6 months and 1 year, is indicated to assess the development of posttraumatic arthritis and/or avascular necrosis.

Implant removal

Implant removal is not necessary unless clinically indicated.

Prognosis of proximal femoral fractures in elderly patients

For prognosis in elderly patients, see the corresponding additional material.

14. Cases

Low lateral escape fracture

This is a simple intertrochanteric fracture. The fracture line starts near the vastus ridge of the greater trochanter. This pattern is referred to as low lateral escape fracture.

Typically, the fracture plane of trochanteric fractures is nearly perpendicular to the direction of the sliding. In the low lateral escape fracture, nailing can not provide sliding because both the nail head and blade/lag screw are in the proximal fragment. Without anatomical reduction, nonunion may occur.

X-ray of a low lateral escape fracture

The postoperative AP x-ray shows distraction at the fracture site. As the nail goes through the proximal fragment itself, the proximal fragment and the nail moves as a single unit. This fixation construct doesn’t allow sliding of the helical blade.

X-ray of an intertochanteric fracture fixed with a short intramedullary nail

This x-ray taken at 9 months postoperatively shows subtle erosion of the endosteal surface of the lateral cortex at the shaft by the windshield motion of the nail. Head and nail composite tilted into varus. The medial fracture gap decreased due to varus. The fracture line is still clearly visible, showing nonunion of the fracture.

X-ray of an intertochanteric fracture fixed with a short intramedullary nail

Simple oblique intertrochanteric fracture

This plain x-ray shows a simple oblique intertrochanteric fracture (31A3.1) (Lim et al 2021). The fracture line starts just below the lateral trochanteric ridge. This fracture pattern needs special attention as the nail does not allow sliding. Anatomical reduction is necessary.

X-ray of a simple oblique intertochanteric fracture

Intraoperative images show near anatomical reduction of the spiral fracture using two Weber forceps.

AP and lateral views of reduction of a simple oblique intertochanteric fracture with Weber forceps

The clinical picture shows the introduction of the forceps through a relatively small incision. Note the orientation of the forceps in different planes as the spiral fracture has two components.

The forceps were used like a cerclage wiring instead of pointed reduction clamping, which is called minimally invasive cerclage clamping.

Clinical picture of a simple oblique intertochanteric fracture reduced with Weber forceps

Final intraoperative AP, lateral, and axial views confirm the reduction and implant positioning.

Final intraoperative views of an intertrochanteric fracture fixed with a short intramedullary nail

The AP x-ray taken 1 year after nailing shows healing without loss of reduction.

Follow-up x-ray of an intertrochanteric fracture fixed with a short intramedullary nail