Authors of section

Authors

Theerachai Apivatthakakul, Jong-Keon Oh

Executive Editor

Michael Baumgaertner

Open all credits

Assessment of reduction quality (trochanteric fractures)

1. General considerations

It is important to assess the reduction quality correctly and repeatedly (to recognize and correct intraoperative redisplacement).

The following displacement patterns should be identified:

  • Discontinuing cortical lines (eg, gaps and step-offs)
  • Overlapping fragments
  • Translation and sagging
  • Angulation (especially varus)

For C-arm positioning to acquire optimal AP, lateral, and axial views, read the additional material on:

2. Reading the fracture lines

Read the fracture line on the image intensifier views. Identify gaps or increased density due to overlapping of fragments.

Follow the medial cortical line on the AP view and the anterior cortical line on the axial view. Identify any translational or angular malalignment.

Patterns in AP and lateral view for acceptable reduction of pertrochanteric fractures

3. Acceptable reduction

Acceptable reduction quality shows the following patterns:

  • No gap or increased density visible along the fracture line

In the AP view:

  • Continuous medial cortical line
  • No varus angulation

In the lateral view:

  • Anteversion approximately 15°
  • Continuous anterior cortical line

This case shows anatomical reduction in the AP view with continuous medial cortical line and physiological coxa vara.

AP view of a reduced pertrochanteric fracture

4. Displacement patterns (cases)

Angulation

Varus angulation

To identify a varus angulation, compare the AP image with the one of the contralateral side, if available.

Alternatively, on the AP image, draw a line along the axis of the proximal femur and a perpendicular line on the level of the tip of the greater trochanter. This line should run through the center of the femoral head.

If it runs above, varus angulation should be suspected.

This case shows anatomical reduction with physiological coxa vara (common in Asian females), requiring 125° implant angulation instead of 130°.

To identify a varus angulation, draw a line along the axis of the proximal femur and a perpendicular line on the level of the tip of the greater trochanter on the AP image. This line should run through the center of the femoral head.
Valgus angulation

AP view with a medial opening (medial cortical line disruption; arrow) and valgus deformity

AP view of a trochanteric fracture with a medial opening (medial cortical line disruption; arrow) and valgus deformity
Anterior angulation

Axial view showing an opening of the anterior cortical line with slight anterior angulation

Axial view of a trochanteric fracture showing an opening of the anterior cortical line with slight anterior angulation

Translation

Axial view with a posterior translation of the shaft, sagging and slight anterior angulation of the proximal fragment

Axial view of a trochanteric fracture with a posterior translation of the shaft, sagging and slight anterior angulation of the proximal fragment

Step-off

In this case of a minimally displaced fracture, there is a step-off (arrows) of the medial cortical line. This can easily be missed and needs to be reduced to prevent excessive fracture collapse into the medullary canal.

In this trochanteric fracture, the medial cortical line shows a step-off, which needs to be reduced because it tends to slide excessively (into the medullary canal).

In the axial view, the displacement into the medullary canal is obvious.

In this trochanteric fracture, the medial cortical line shows a step-off, which needs to be reduced because it tends to slide excessively (into the medullary canal).
Go to diagnosis