Oblique radial fracture: lag screw and plate fixation

For oblique forearm shaft fractures, interfragmentary compression can be achieved either by using an independent primary lag screw, protected by a plate (A), or by using a compression plate as the primary loading device with the addition of a subsequent lag screw through the plate (B).

Absolute fracture stability, which is defined as the complete abolition of interfragmentary movement, is achieved by interfragmentary compression. It results in direct bone healing (in simple fracture configurations).

If available, a partially threaded cortical lag screw (shaft screw) can be used to accomplish interfragmentary compression.

The holes of the plate are shaped like an angled cylinder. The spherical undersurface of the screw head slides down the inclined cylinder as the screw is tightened.

The horizontal movement of the head, as it impacts against the angled side of the hole, results in movement of the bone fragment relative to the plate, and leads to compression of the fracture.

Depending on the procedure chosen, the plate will be applied to either the anterior or posterior surface of the radius.

In the following example, we illustrate the plate applied to the posterior surface.

For proximal radial shaft fractures, the anterior approach (Henry) is most often used to minimize the risk of damage to the posterior interosseous nerve, which crosses the proximal radius within the supinator muscle.

In mid and distal radial shaft fractures, either the anterior approach (Henry) or posterolateral approach (Thompson) can be used, depending on surgeon’s preference.

In the forearm, in addition to any lag screw, three bicortical plate screws are required in each main fracture fragment due to the high torsional stresses. For biomechanical reasons, not every plate hole needs to be occupied by a screw. Therefore, plates with at least 8 or 9 holes are usually used.

If the fracture morphology dictates that the interfragmentary lag screw be positioned separate from the plate, the plate then acts as a neutralization (protection) plate and axial compression should not be applied.

Insert the 3.5 mm / 2.5 mm drill guide into the gliding hole. Check that the anatomical reduction is maintained and use a 2.5 mm drill bit to drill a pilot hole just through the far cortex.

Insert the sleeve of the 3.5 mm / 2.5 mm drill guide through the plate and into the gliding hole. Check that the anatomical reduction is maintained and use a 2.5 mm drill bit to drill a pilot hole just through the far cortex.

Insert the lag screw through the plate and carefully tighten it, making sure that the fracture stays reduced, is compressed, and that the plate sits accurately on the bone surface.

Complete the fixation by inserting the plate screws in neutral mode, usually alternately, in both main fragments.

After the plate has been contoured anatomically to the reduced bone surface, prebend the plate with the handheld bending pliers, or a pair of bending irons.

Note: Because of the design of the LC-DCP holes, the neutral drill guides for the LC-DCP have a very slightly eccentric hole and an arrow, which needs always to point towards the fracture line.

A reduction forceps is placed on the opposite fragment to hold it in the reduced position against the plate.

Then, using the same independent screw, axial compression can be obtained by pulling the plate end towards the screw with a small Verbrugge clamp.

Once reduced, a second screw is inserted eccentrically (yellow drill sleeve) into the reduced fragment.

By tightening the eccentrically-inserted screw, axial compression is achieved.

For inserting screws into the limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP), the Universal Drill Guide can be used as well. When this drill guide is pressed into the plate hole, the screw position will be neutral (A). When it is held against the end of the plate hole, without exerting downward pressure, the screw position will be eccentric (B).

The stability of a plate fixation in oblique fractures can be greatly increased by inserting a lag screw through the plate after primary axial compression has been achieved.

All other plate screws are now inserted in a neutral position (green drill sleeve) and do not serve further to increase compression.

This illustration shows the completed compression plate osteosynthesis of a oblique fracture with additional lag screw fixation.

Check the completed osteosynthesis by image intensification. Make sure that the plate is at a proper location, the screws are of appropriate length and a desired reduction was achieved.

The elbow should be stabilized at the epicondyles and the forearm rotation should be checked between the radial and ulnar styloids.

Before starting the operation the uninjured side should be tested as a reference for the injured side.

After fixation, the distal radioulnar joint should be assessed for forearm rotation, as well as for stability. The forearm should be rotated completely to make certain there is no anatomical block.

The elbow is flexed 90° on the arm table and displacement in dorsal palmar direction is tested in a neutral rotation of the forearm with the wrist in neutral position.

This is repeated with the wrist in radial deviation, which stabilizes the DRUJ, if the ulnar collateral complex (TFCC) is not disrupted.

This is repeated with the wrist in full supination and full pronation.

In order to test the stability of the distal radioulnar joint, the ulna is compressed against the radius...

...while the forearm is passively put through full supination...

...and pronation.

If there is a palpable “clunk”, then instability of the distal radioulnar joint should be considered. This would be an indication for internal fixation of an ulnar styloid fracture at its base. If the fracture is at the tip of the ulnar styloid consider TFCC stabilization.

Following stable fixation, postoperative treatment is usually functional.

Immobilization in a circular cast may compromise the range of motion later. Temporary immobilization with a well-padded, bulky splint for 10-14 days is advised to allow adequate soft-tissue healing. During this period, elevation, gentle finger motion, active and passive, together with elbow flexion/extension and shoulder motion, can be started. The splint is then removed and active assisted range of motion exercises, including gentle forearm rotation, begin.

Lifting and resisted exercises are restricted until radiographic signs of healing appear. More intensive exercises, such as progressive resisted exercises can start thereafter. Timing of return to sport will depend on the individual patient and the nature of the sport.

Close postoperative follow-up is required in fractures that have been treated by means of absolute stability. Direct bone healing without callus formation is anticipated and early signs of instability with the presence of irritation callus should alert the surgeon to consider secondary interventions, such as restabilization and bone grafting.

Follow-up x-rays should be obtained according to local protocol. X-rays to assess fracture position are usually taken at 1, 2, and 4 weeks after operation. Subsequent x-rays are usually taken to assess bony healing at appropriate intervals from 6-8 weeks, depending on the fracture configuration and potential for healing.

In forearm shaft fractures, the issue of implant removal is controversial. As the radius and ulna are not weightbearing bones, and as removal of plates can be a demanding procedure, implant removal is not indicated as a routine. There is a high risk of nerve damage associated with procedures to remove forearm plates.

Furthermore, as there is significant risk of refracture, most surgeons prefer not to remove plates from the forearm.

The general guidelines today are:

• removal only in symptomatic patients, possibly only on the ulna where the implants are subcutaneous
• removal no earlier than 2 years after osteosynthesis
• If both bones have been plated, sequential removal of implants with a least 6 months in between is recommended (risk of refracture).

• Bednar DA, Grandwilewski W (1992) Complications of forearm-plate removal. Can J Surg; 35(4):428-431.
• Langkamer VG, Ackroyd CE (1990) Removal of forearm plates. A review of the complications. J Bone Joint Surg Br; 72(4):601-604.
• Rosson JW, Shearer JR (1991) Refracture after the removal of plates from the forearm. An avoidable complication. J Bone Joint Surg; 73(3): 415-417.
• Heim D, Capo JT (2007) Forearm, shaft. Rüedi TP, Buckley RE, Moran CG (eds), AO Principles of Fracture Management, Vol. 2. Stuttgart New York: Thieme-Verlag, 643-656.