1. Home
  2. Skeleton
  3. Diagnosis
  4. Indications
  5. Treatment

Authors of section

Authors (on behalf of the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor)

Ilya Laufer, JJ Verlaan

General Editor

Luiz Vialle

Open all credits

Subaxial cervical, unstable, low ESCC

 
 
 
 
 

The choice between an anterior and posterior approach will be determined by the individual case and preoperative imaging, taking into account the location of the tumor and the destruction of the spine.

The choice between an anterior and posterior approach will be determined by the individual case and preoperative imaging, taking into account the location of the tumor and the destruction of the spine.

Nonoperative treatment

occipitocervical unstable high escc

Main indications

 
 
Patient not fit for surgery due to medical comorbidities or very advanced metastatic disease.

Nonoperative treatment consists of radiotherapy, and if needed, brace stabilization to prevent ranges of motion that cause pain.

Patient not fit for surgery due to medical comorbidities or very advanced metastatic disease.

Nonoperative treatment consists of radiotherapy, and if needed, brace stabilization to prevent ranges of motion that cause pain.

Anterior corpectomy and stabilzation

Main indications

 
 
Gross destruction of the vertebral bodies without posterior involvement

Contraindications

  • Extensive neck treatment including radiation and prior surgery

Advantages

  • Anterior column support
  • Favorable wound healing

Disadvantages

  • Risk of esophageal or vascular injury

Gross destruction of the vertebral bodies without posterior involvement

Contraindications

  • Extensive neck treatment including radiation and prior surgery

Advantages

  • Anterior column support
  • Favorable wound healing

Disadvantages

  • Risk of esophageal or vascular injury

Posterior stabilization C3-C7

Main indications

 
 
Multilevel disease or circumferential tumors

Advantages

  • Multilevel osseous fixation
  • Possibility to extend fixation to the thoracic spine

Disadvantages

  • Extensive paraspinal muscle dissection
  • Need for a longer construct compared to stand alone anterior approach
Multilevel disease or circumferential tumors

Advantages

  • Multilevel osseous fixation
  • Possibility to extend fixation to the thoracic spine

Disadvantages

  • Extensive paraspinal muscle dissection
  • Need for a longer construct compared to stand alone anterior approach

Posterior stabilization C7-T1

Main indications

 
 

Advantages

  • Multilevel osseous fixation
  • Possibility to extend fixation to the thoracic spine

Disadvantages

  • Extensive paraspinal muscle dissection
  • Need for a longer construct compared to stand alone anterior approach

Advantages

  • Multilevel osseous fixation
  • Possibility to extend fixation to the thoracic spine

Disadvantages

  • Extensive paraspinal muscle dissection
  • Need for a longer construct compared to stand alone anterior approach

Combined anterior and posterior

Main indications

 
 
Multilevel disease or circumferential tumors

Since most cases can be solved by either an anterior or posterior approach, the combined approach is only indicated in rare cases.

Advantages

  • Multilevel osseous fixation

Disadvantages

  • Extensive paraspinal muscle dissection
  • Need for a longer construct compared to stand alone anterior approach
  • Risk of esophageal or vascular injury
  • Need for longer or multistage surgery
Multilevel disease or circumferential tumors

Since most cases can be solved by either an anterior or posterior approach, the combined approach is only indicated in rare cases.

Advantages

  • Multilevel osseous fixation

Disadvantages

  • Extensive paraspinal muscle dissection
  • Need for a longer construct compared to stand alone anterior approach
  • Risk of esophageal or vascular injury
  • Need for longer or multistage surgery