Bridge plating uses the plate as an extramedullary splint, fixed to the two main fragments, while the intermediate fracture zone is left untouched. Anatomical reduction of the wedge fragments is not necessary. Furthermore, direct manipulation risks disturbing their blood supply. If the soft-tissue attachments are preserved, and the fragments are relatively well aligned, healing is predictable.
Correction of length, rotation and axial alignment of the main shaft fragments can usually be achieved indirectly, using traction and soft-tissue tension.
Mechanical stability, provided by the bridging plate, is adequate for indirect healing (callus formation).
For minimal invasive surgery, the use of an image intensifier is recommended.
If the fibula has a simple fracture pattern, plating this fracture first will provide an indirect reduction of the tibia, establishing length and approximate rotational and axial alignment.
Bridge plates can be inserted, as illustrated, either with an open exposure that carefully preserves soft-tissue attachments to the fracture fragments, or with a minimally invasive approach that leaves skin and soft tissue intact over the fracture site.
With the minimally invasive (MIPO) approach, incisions are made proximally and distally, and the plate is inserted through an extraperiosteal tunnel. Such minimally invasive plating should be done using image intensification (if available).
The lateral approach is used for minimally invasive osteosynthesis if the medial soft tissues are injured.
This approach is also used when a precontoured plate (eg, LISS plate) is placed laterally, for fixation of proximal and mid-tibial fractures.
Minimally invasive fixation of tibial fractures is preferably done through the medial approach, especially for distal fractures.
It is important to restore length, axial alignment and rotation.
Apply longitudinal traction to the foot to restore length. When length is restored, correct the axial and rotational alignment.
Compare length, alignment and rotation with the uninjured side.
If reduction cannot be achieved by manual traction, use a large distractor for closed reduction. Place one Schanz pin in both the proximal and distal main fragments. Distraction is applied across these pins by turning the thumb screw.
If a distractor is not available, an external fixator can be used instead.
Check reduction, and if necessary, correct rotational deformity.
As bridge plating should span a long section of the bone, the length of the implant has to be chosen accordingly. A good rule of thumb is to calculate that one third of the plate should cover the fracture zone, with one third of the length on either side of the fracture. However, the longer the plate, the better. Usually a narrow large fragment plate is chosen.
An angular stable (locking) plate is a good option in osteoporotic bone, and for fractures with a short end segment. Such a plate needs not to be contoured precisely to fit the bone, since it functions as an internal fixator. Attaching it to the bone does not alter fracture alignment, since the screws do not pull the main bone fragments to the plate.
Minimal contouring will be necessary over the fracture site. However, it may be helpful to contour the ends to fit the bone where the plate will be affixed.
To match the orientation of the anteromedial surface of the distal tibia, the distal end of the plate will need to be twisted.
If the fracture extends proximally, generally a locking plate is placed laterally because the implant allows us to deal with more proximally located fractures, and may avoid damaged medial soft tissues.
In distal fractures, the preference is to place the plate medially. Anterior and lateral soft tissues (tendon, nerve and blood vessels) make safe placement of the plate laterally difficult.
The plate can be inserted either through the proximal (antegrade) or distal incision (in a retrograde manner).
The tunnel for the plate should be prepared at the time of making the approach either with a specialized tunneling tool, or with blunt instruments.
Fixation begins at the extremes of the plate, either the proximal end, or the distal end.
Drill with a 3.2 mm drill bit and drill guide centrically through the plate hole. Measure for screw length, tap with a 4.5 mm tap and a protective sleeve and insert the first screw.
At this point, length, rotation and coronal alignment should be checked and, if necessary, corrected.
Insert the second screw in the same fashion as described for the first screw.
Some sagittal displacement can be corrected after the second screw has been inserted by placing a rolled towel, or similar device, underneath the center of the fracture. The weight of the lower limb will usually correct the sagittal displacement.
If image intensification is available, check the completed reduction before inserting further screws.
Alternating from one main fragment to the other, insert the remaining screws.
For these screws, additional small incisions over the plate are necessary.
Place two screws as close to the fracture zone as practicable in each main fragment. A minimum of three screws on each side should be used.
If a locking plate is used, placing the locking screws adjacent to the bridged zone should be avoided.
Perioperative antibiotics may be discontinued before 24-48 hours.
After surgery, the patient’s leg should be slightly elevated, with the leg placed on a pillow, 4 cm above the level of the heart.
Attention is given to:
A brief period of splintage may be beneficial for protection of the soft tissues, but should last no longer than 1-2 weeks. Thereafter, mobilization of the ankle and subtalar joints should be encouraged.
Active and assisted motion of all joints (hip, knee, ankle, toes) may begin as soon as the patient is comfortable. Attempt to preserve passive dorsiflexion range of motion.
Limited weight-bearing (15 kg maximum), with crutches, may begin as tolerated, but full weight bearing should be avoided until fracture healing is more advanced (10-12 weeks).
Follow-up is recommended after 2, 6 and 12 weeks, and every 6-12 weeks thereafter until radiographic healing and function are established. Depending on the consolidation, weight bearing can be increased after 6-8 weeks with full weight bearing when the fracture has healed by x-ray.
Implant removal may be necessary in cases of soft-tissue irritation by the implants. The best time for implant removal is after complete bone remodeling, usually at least 24 months after surgery. This is to reduce the risk of refracture.