Postoperative reviews are determined by the likely rate and completeness of healing of the periprosthetic fracture. Therefore, the patient should be checked when the natural history of healing is anticipated to show union, and then consolidation of the fracture. These time points are generally at six weeks, three months, and six months following surgery. Imaging is obtained at these time points to monitor fracture healing.
Long-term outcome reviews are relevant to understand the value of the intervention for the patient. Ideally, the patient should be checked at one year, two years, five years, and ten years postoperatively.
Both subjective (patient) and objective (clinician) observations are relevant to understanding the value of the intervention.
There are many ways to assess the outcome from a patient’s perspective. Subjective scores include the following:
There are many such assessment tools. Individual institutions will need to use the most appropriate for their cases.
There are many ways to assess the outcome from a clinician's perspective. Objective evaluation includes the following:
These measures are included in many outcome scores. Commonly used outcome scores include:
There are many such assessment tools. Individual institutions will need to use the most appropriate for their cases.
Routine radiographs are obtained at postoperative follow-up visits. X-rays are obtained in three views (true AP, axillary view, Y view).
A CT scan of the arm may be helpful if there is any doubt about the completeness of healing or the security of implantation of the prosthesis. This is relevant if there is any doubt about the safety of progression of rehabilitation.
Adverse events are related to:
Most adverse events relating to the prosthesis occur within the first three months. These include:
Adverse events relating to the fracture include:
Late adverse events include